Why Brands Support Charities – and How To Choose A Charity
Brands often align with charities to:
- Demonstrate their values (e.g. compassion, environmental responsibility, community care)
- Build trust and goodwill with customers, employees and partners
- Enhance brand image and reputation
- Engage staff through meaningful initiatives (e.g. volunteering, matched donations)
- Strengthen customer loyalty by supporting causes that matter to their audience
- Create media or content opportunities (e.g. PR, storytelling, campaigns)
- Differentiate themselves in a crowded market through purpose-driven marketing.
But this is not purely altruistic. Brands usually look for some form of return:
What Brands Look for in Return
- Alignment with brand values and mission
- Positive PR and brand association
- Audience reach (shared demographics)
- Measurable impact and transparency
- Low reputational risk
- Opportunities for staff or customer engagement
- Content/storytelling potential (e.g. for campaigns)
- Tangible results or metrics to report (e.g. funds raised, lives impacted).
Charity Partnership Checklist for Brands
Use this checklist to evaluate whether a charity is the right fit for your brand:
1. Mission & Values Alignment
- Does the charity’s mission align with your brand’s values or purpose?
- Is the cause one your team and/or customers genuinely care about?
- Is the charity apolitical and non-controversial, or are there sensitive issues involved?
2. Credibility & Track Record
- Is the charity registered, audited and compliant with local laws?
- Does it have a clear history of impact and transparency?
- Can they provide annual reports or case studies?
- Are there any past scandals or controversies? (Google the organisation’s name + “controversy” or “criticism”)
3. Brand Reputation Risk
- Is the charity involved in polarising issues (e.g. politics, religion, activism)?
- Could a partnership alienate any part of your customer base?
- Is the organisation financially or operationally stable?
- Are they associated with any individuals or groups that carry reputational risk?
4. Partnership Fit
- What type of partnership is expected? (e.g. donations, co-branding, content, volunteering)
- Are expectations clear and manageable on both sides?
- Are there opportunities for shared campaigns, PR, or storytelling?
- Is the charity responsive and professional in their communication?
5. Impact & Accountability
- Can the charity show how donated funds are used?
- Are there measurable outcomes you can report on?
- Can they help you create content, visuals or case studies for your brand?
- Will they acknowledge your support publicly?
6. Audience Match
- Does the charity’s community or demographic overlap with your customer base?
- Will your audience see this partnership as authentic?
- Could you involve your customers in fundraising or awareness campaigns?
Caution: Red Flags to Watch For
- Poor financial transparency or vague impact reporting
- Strong political, ideological or religious affiliations (unless clearly aligned)
- Highly emotional or manipulative fundraising tactics
- Unprofessional communication or lack of clarity about expectations
- Demands for exclusive or long-term commitments too early
- Charities that focus heavily on the founder or have a cult of personality
- Charities in unstable regions or with potential legal/ethical complications.
Case Studies
Positive Case Studies (Good Fit, Clear Wins)
- Whittaker’s & Kiwis for Kiwi (NZ)
- What happened: Whittaker’s partnered with Kiwis for Kiwi to raise funds for kiwi conservation, releasing limited-edition chocolate bars with conservation-themed wrappers.
- Why it worked:
- Strong national pride appeal
- Whittaker’s brand already aligned with ethical sourcing and local values
- High consumer engagement with a measurable outcome: each bar helped fund kiwi (endangered bird, national icon) sanctuaries.
- Takeaway: Simple, authentic, values-aligned partnership with local impact wins hearts and builds brand loyalty.
- Patagonia & Environmental Causes (USA)
- What happened: Patagonia donates 1% of its sales to grassroots environmental groups and often takes clear stances on environmental issues.
- Why it worked:
- Deep authenticity: the brand’s entire business model supports sustainability
- Long-term commitment and transparency
- Appeals to their core audience who expect purpose-driven action.
- Takeaway: If a brand walks its talk and aligns deeply with its cause, even bold political stands can strengthen loyalty.
- Boots & Macmillan Cancer Support (UK)
- What happened: Boots UK formed a long-term partnership with Macmillan Cancer Support, training pharmacy staff to support cancer patients.
- Why it worked:
- Staff involvement created internal buy-in
- Tangible help for people in vulnerable moments
- Professional execution and consistency.
- Takeaway: Deeper partnerships (beyond donations) create more impact and credibility.
Negative or Risky Case Studies (Poor Fit or Controversy)
- Pinkwashing Backlash – Various Brands & Breast Cancer Charities (Global)
- What happened: Some brands (especially in the beauty, alcohol, and processed food industries) partnered with breast cancer charities, while selling products that may increase cancer risk (e.g. alcohol, high-sugar foods).
- Why it backfired:
- Accusations of “pinkwashing” – using a serious cause to mask harmful products
- Disconnect between cause and brand values
- Little real transparency about where money went.
- Takeaway: A poor fit between product and cause creates cynicism and reputational risk.
- Save the Children & UK Government (UK)
- What happened: Save the Children faced criticism for giving former PM Tony Blair a “Global Legacy Award”, despite controversy over the Iraq War.
- Why it backfired:
- Staff and public outrage – over 500 employees signed a protest letter
- Seen as politically compromised.
- Takeaway: Charity reputation issues can blow back on brand partners – especially when politics are involved.
- Woolworths & Aussie Farmers (Australia)
- What happened: Woolworths launched the “Fresh in our Memories” campaign to support drought-stricken farmers – but asked customers to donate at checkout rather than contributing corporate funds.
- Why it backfired:
- Perceived as shifting responsibility to the public
- Brand profiting from the goodwill without real sacrifice
- Media and public backlash.
- Takeaway: Performative charity without skin in the game feels hollow and can spark backlash.
Summary
When done well, brand-charity partnerships:
But when done poorly, or when the brand seems opportunistic, misaligned or uncommitted, they can quickly become PR liabilities.
- Strengthen trust
- Deepen customer engagement
- Create powerful stories.
But when done poorly, or when the brand seems opportunistic, misaligned or uncommitted, they can quickly become PR liabilities.